
The England international player Dawid Malan has stated that the ICC should consider legalising ball tampering. He stated that the bowlers should have the freedom to scratch the ball and tamper with it, unless something external is used. He added that when the ball is being tampered with, it creates more balanced contests as the bowlers have things in their favour. It may be considered as a controversial suggestion but it could be given a thought.
"I genuinely think it should be allowed, let players work on the ball, like scratching it, as long as nothing external is used. Generating reverse swing is a skill in itself. It would make the game more balanced for bowlers towards the end and create tighter contests, rather than teams cruising to wins with wickets in hand, “ said Dawid Malan on BBC’S Strategic Timeout Podcast. https://x.com/TsMeSalman1_/status/2043669218541941181
Bowling advantage vs batting fairness: Dawid Malan’s suggestion ignites debate
The claim of Dawid Malan can definitely be just looked upon as the point he states is valid up to a point. From a bowler’s point of view, the bowler will be under pressure to produce results with the new ball. As the new ball gives the bowler the room to swing the ball and trouble the batters. But very often bowlers get to their rhythm after bowling a couple of overs and by then the ball will get old. If such practises such as scratching the ball happens in a controlled environment, the bowler will be able to have an advantage in the latter phase of the innings as well. He also states that the ability to generate reverse swing is a skill in itself and it gives the bowlers a considerable edge. Unless an external object comes into play, the bowlers will enjoy the advantage of tampering the ball.
From the batter’s point of view, it could be a very controversial decision to make as it the benefit may not weigh the same impact on both sides. The batters face the pressure of combatting the swing of the new ball and they have the mindset to just play through it. Batting becomes considerably easier as the ball gets old as the batters do not have to worry about the movement of the ball. With the permission to tamper the ball, the batters may feel disadvantaged. The batters will have to constantly worry about the movement of the ball whereas in the existing scenario both batters and bowlers have equally weighed advantages and disadvantages.
The opinion of Dawid Malan seems to favour the bowlers but with respect to the modern game, the bowlers are shown absolutely no mercy. To balance out the game such practises could be considered but again the batters may feel disadvantaged and they will be facing added pressure in every ball they face.



