Picture Credit: X

Picture Credit: X

The cricketing world is once again buzzing after Pakistan reportedly laid down clear conditions to resume matches against India, a development that has instantly sparked debate across fans, experts and former players. India vs Pakistan is not just a cricket match — it is the biggest rivalry in world cricket, and any update around it is bound to grab global attention.

Sources close to SportsTiger confirm that Pakistan has put forward three key demands if it is to play India in future tournaments or series. These conditions are already being widely discussed and could have major implications for international cricket going forward.

Increased Share of ICC Revenue on the Table

One of Pakistan’s primary demands is an increased share of ICC revenue. India–Pakistan matches generate massive global viewership, record-breaking broadcast numbers and enormous sponsorship value. Pakistan believes its participation in these high-voltage fixtures contributes significantly to ICC earnings and wants a bigger financial stake in return.

This demand has reopened conversations around revenue distribution in international cricket, an issue that has long divided cricket boards across the world.

Bilateral Series vs India

Another major condition is the restoration of bilateral cricket between India and Pakistan. The two teams have not played a bilateral series for several years, meeting only during ICC tournaments and Asia Cups.

Pakistan’s stance suggests that tournament-only encounters are no longer enough. A return to bilateral cricket would mark a historic shift and could redefine relations on the cricketing front, though it remains a sensitive and complex topic.

Handshake Protocols Spark Fresh Debate

Perhaps the most talked-about condition is the enforcement of handshake protocols during matches. Pakistan has reportedly insisted on formal handshakes being respected on the field, adding a symbolic layer to the discussion.

While handshakes are a traditional part of the game, this demand has ignited debate among fans - some seeing it as a gesture of sportsmanship, others calling it unnecessary drama around an already intense rivalry.